It was nice to see some new and previous faces as we commenced our workshops on Mythology and Embodiment in danger. Craig did some nice groundwork on Idea Mapping fantasy and the Linguistics of fantasy in addition to work on fashions and the parable of the Scientific Technique. I began out by exploring Myths at 4 ranges Worldwide, Nationwide, Native and Private myths with case research in every to point out how fantasy is made.
You will need to perceive what fantasy is as most misunderstand it as fable, fairy story or legend and this isn’t the case. Delusion is its personal distinctive style however stands aside from different types of realizing based mostly on proof and observe. Delusion is a singular manner of understanding story, semiotics, narrative, discourse, meaning-making (semiosis) and cultural perception methods. If one doesn’t embrace a examine of fantasy in an understanding of tradition, one is NOT speaking about tradition.
Myths are neither good or unhealthy, rational or irrational however fairly a non-rational manner of realizing utilizing faith-belief in realizing. One of many case research for instance, was of the Simpson and his Donkey Delusion, a Nationwide icon and image for heroics, mateship and heroism however none of it’s true. But, statues, cash, stamps and different memorabilia exist that symbolically keep the parable. Most fantasy is maintained this manner together with many security myths (https://safetyrisk.web/the-power-of-safety-myths/).
And, it doesn’t matter what myth-busting is printed (eg. Wilson, Mud, Donkeys and Delusions, The Delusion of Simpson and his Donkey), myths do NOT go away or disappear. It’s because all fantasy is based on an ethic of faith-belief that’s neither rational or irrational.
As soon as a fantasy has been given symbolic energy it’s practically not possible to take it away. Because of this Security retains inventing new myths upon myths because it discovers that the earlier fantasy didn’t work.
It wouldn’t matter what proof was supplied to display that the Swiss-cheese, danger matrix, bow-tie, Bradley Curve or Heinrich’s pyramid had been myths, they may nonetheless be believed as efficacious. Religion in these myths in Security is institutionalised, believed in religion, attributed with energy and infused with symbolic and political energy.
Delusion-busing in Security is known NOT as demonstrating proof of actuality however demonised as being anti-safety.
That is how all religions work.
The actual check of any fantasy is its moral final result and Security appears to have little interest in such. Certainly, within the AIHS BoK Chapter on Ethics there isn’t any point out of energy, zero, tradition, fantasy or and ethic of danger. It’s only a defence of deontological ethics finest fitted to blind compliance however, it’s says little or no about Ethics.
Once we take a look at these fashions (symbolic metaphors) which can be utilized in security it’s clear that this semiotics have extra in frequent with artwork than science. None of those fashions are ‘goal’, they can’t be. Neither can any of those fashions contribute to measurement, the nice love of security. Neither can any of those fashions assist with understanding ‘controls’, the second nice love of security. What occurs in these semiotic metaphors utilized by security is the creation of attachment by way of symbolic religion that then turns into a marker for political belonging. And, for those who criticise fantasy you’re rapidly ousted politically. Eg. criticise zero in a zero organisation and see how lengthy you’ll final.
There may be nevertheless various to myths which can be neither moral nor efficient however these depend on a really totally different ethic and methodology by which security reveals little curiosity. The strategies supplied by SPoR not solely work (https://www.humandymensions.com/product/it-works-a-new-approach-to-risk-and-safety-book-for-free-download/) however are sensible, constructive and humanise tackling danger within the office.