When one reads ISO 45003 or another Codes of Follow concerning Psychosocial Well being it’s clear that the engineers are on the town. It’s as if a ‘reduce and paste’ has been carried out associating Psychosocial well being as whether it is simply one other hazard. It’s NOT!
After all, the historical past of the security trade and its understanding of hazards is the historical past of controlling objects. 85% of the AIHS BoK is in regards to the management of objects. For instance, the foolish concept of ‘damaging energies’ (AIHS BoK on Causation) and viewing people as organic objects (AIHS BoK People as a Organic System). Even an off-the-cuff studying of the AIHS BoK Chapter on Hazards makes it clear that the trade understands hazards as objects (with damaging energies).
And while you ever learn any of these things on hazards, even when the language of ‘human components’ is used. It’s by no means about fallible individuals. Human components security is in regards to the research of people as a ‘issue’ in a system.
All through the historical past of security, the main focus has been on the management of objects. And that is how ISO 45003 and related Codes of Follow learn regarding Psychosocial well being.
There may be merely no focus of any substance of individuals within the security curriculum.
Now abruptly the trade needs to undo 50 years of historical past and try to view the ‘entire individual’ while on the similar time selling the view that people are hazards (https://safetyrisk.web/the-enemy-of-safety-humans/; https://safetyrisk.web/the-language-of-hazards-and-psychosocial-mental-health/). You couldn’t make these things up. While additionally guaranteeing that the language of ‘skilled’ is all the time uttered because the dominant adjective for the administration and policing of objects.
Even when Security needs to speak about tradition it by no means speaks of entire individuals. The AIHS BoK Chapter on Ethics doesn’t focus on care ethics, entire individuals or serving to.
Simply learn ISO 45003 or any of the codes of observe and also you received’t discover something on the care of individuals. The aim of those paperwork is compliance with OHS Administration Techniques. Right here is only one instance (part 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 45003):
Simply take a look at the language that frames all concern about exterior and inner points.
What’s the focus? The outcomes of the Security Administration System!
BTW, Security demonstrates clearly over its historical past that it has completely no thought what confidentiality means. Skilled confidentiality is the bedrock {of professional} counselling.
And in the event you learn the preamble of any of the codes of observe the commonest language is about compliance! This from the Foreword of the NSW Code of Follow – Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work.
Fantastic stuff! And the way good that an inspector can PIN your job web site for a Psychosocial situation they haven’t any {qualifications} or expertise in!
All of this demonstrates that Security has no clue about Psychosocial well being and considers it as any hazard as, simply the management of objects.
In SPoR, we perceive that security is in regards to the care and serving to of individuals in moral observe. We perceive that tackling threat in Psychosocial and Psychological Well being are a ‘depraved Downside’. Because of this treating this situation as a ‘hazard’ can solely make issues worse.
People are NOT objects in programs.People are NOT hazards.Neither are the signs of Psychosocial and Psychological Well being a ‘hazard’.
The language of ‘Psychosocial hazard’ is a recipe for brutalism, poisonous workplaces and driving associated points underground.
All of this superbly resonates with the worldwide mantra of zero, intolerance and controlling objects.
I do know. Let’s present our concern for poisonous workplaces and hurt by creating a typical and code to make them extra poisonous and dangerous.
Are you able to simply think about a Security Administration System the place private considerations, stressors, psychological well being points and relational/social considerations are registered and reported as a ‘hazard’ on a hazard register. You could possibly make this s%#t up.
Welcome to the nightmare (https://safetyrisk.web/welcome-to-the-nightmare-safety-creates-its-own-minefield-as-usual/) as solely Security can dream them.
Newest posts by Dr Rob Lengthy (see all)
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA
Rob is the founding father of Human Dymensions and has intensive expertise, {qualifications} and experience throughout a spread of sectors together with authorities, schooling, company, trade and group sectors over 30 years. Rob has labored in any respect ranges of the schooling and coaching sector together with serving on varied publish graduate government, publish graduate supervision, publish graduate course design and implementation packages.
